Comments on: Firefox FUD http://codedump.blergh.be/2008/08/30/firefox-fud/ Code Ramblings Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:42:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3 By: Bookmarks about Code http://codedump.blergh.be/2008/08/30/firefox-fud/#comment-1640 Bookmarks about Code Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:00:31 +0000 http://codedump.blergh.be/?p=49#comment-1640 [...] - bookmarked by 3 members originally found by mrees on 2008-09-27 Firefox FUD http://codedump.blergh.be/2008/08/30/firefox-fud/ - bookmarked by 4 members originally found by [...] [...] – bookmarked by 3 members originally found by mrees on 2008-09-27 Firefox FUD http://codedump.blergh.be/2008/08/30/firefox-fud/ – bookmarked by 4 members originally found by [...]

]]> By: Brian King http://codedump.blergh.be/2008/08/30/firefox-fud/#comment-1254 Brian King Mon, 01 Sep 2008 10:53:38 +0000 http://codedump.blergh.be/?p=49#comment-1254 Peter B : Re: "Bad plugins degrade the user experience of the browser. FF could have mitigated that risk" How? Mozilla already does by thoroughly reviewing all add-ons on Mozilla Add-ons. Extensions installed elsewhere are at your own risk. Did you mean technically? Peter B : Re: “Bad plugins degrade the user experience of the browser. FF could have mitigated that risk”

How? Mozilla already does by thoroughly reviewing all add-ons on Mozilla Add-ons. Extensions installed elsewhere are at your own risk. Did you mean technically?

]]> By: Peter B http://codedump.blergh.be/2008/08/30/firefox-fud/#comment-1229 Peter B Sat, 30 Aug 2008 21:34:43 +0000 http://codedump.blergh.be/?p=49#comment-1229 @First: the story doesn't claim Google owns FF. It merely points out that FF relies on Google for 85 per cent of its revenues. @Second: security is a common argument against IE. In that context, pointing out this FF flaw is a valid point. @Third - since you don't disagree with the point itself, no comment :) @Fourth: have you tried looking? http://www.webperformanceinc.com/library/reports/Safari%20Benchmarks/ @Fifth: Bad plugins degrade the user experience of the browser. FF could have mitigated that risk. @First: the story doesn’t claim Google owns FF. It merely points out that FF relies on Google for 85 per cent of its revenues.

@Second: security is a common argument against IE. In that context, pointing out this FF flaw is a valid point.

@Third – since you don’t disagree with the point itself, no comment :)

@Fourth: have you tried looking? http://www.webperformanceinc.com/library/reports/Safari%20Benchmarks/

@Fifth: Bad plugins degrade the user experience of the browser. FF could have mitigated that risk.

]]>